![]() |
|
![]() Recent articles A soundtrack for study Springer hires open access pioneer Tigers and gorillas - for sale on the internet Boost to economy hidden in the cupboard Violent porn sites face government crackdown Vanity Fair crowns the übergeek emperors Emergency workers join the blog set Apple in a stew as Microsoft wins iPod patent ruling The Guardian profile: Tim Berners-Lee Sponsors revel in mobile revolution He sent 38 billion emails and called himself the Spam King. Then Bill Gates went after him Yahoo close to $1m stake in Chinese online retailer This is a battle every user has to join Yahoo! buys Chinese web retailer |
Emails 'pose threat to IQ' Martin Wainwright Friday April 22, 2005 The Guardian The distractions of constant emails, text and phone messages are a greater threat to IQ and concentration than taking cannabis, according to a survey of befuddled volunteers. Doziness, lethargy and an increasing inability to focus reached "startling" levels in the trials by 1,100 people, who also demonstrated that emails in particular have an addictive, drug-like grip. Respondents' minds were all over the place as they faced new questions and challenges every time an email dropped into their inbox. Productivity at work was damaged and the effect on staff who could not resist trying to juggle new messages with existing work was the equivalent, over a day, to the loss of a night's sleep. "This is a very real and widespread phenomenon," said Glenn Wilson, a psychologist from King's College, London University, who carried out 80 clinical trials for TNS research, commissioned by the IT firm Hewlett Packard. The average IQ loss was measured at 10 points, more than double the four point mean fall found in studies of cannabis users. The most damage was done, according to the survey, by the almost complete lack of discipline in handling emails. Dr Wilson and his colleagues found a compulsion to reply to each new message, leading to constant changes of direction which inevitably tired and slowed down the brain. Manners are also going by the board, with one in five of the respondents breaking off from meals or social engagements to receive and deal with messages. Although nine out of 10 agreed that answering messages during face-to-face meetings or office conferences was rude, a third nonetheless felt that this had become "acceptable and seen as a sign of diligence and efficiency". In fact, it is a recipe for muddled thinking and poor performance, said Dr Wilson, who also called for restraint by the two-thirds of people who check work emails out of office hours and even on holiday. He said: "Companies should encourage a more balanced and appropriate way of working." Special reports Medicine and health Useful links British Medical Association Department of Health General Medical Council Health on the Net Foundation Institute of Cancer Research Medical Research Council NHS Direct Royal Institute of Public Health World Health Organisation Printable version | Send it to a friend | Save story |
|||||